Expanding Access to Advanced Cardiac Care

One Connected Path for Cardiac Care

From cardiac rehabilitation and outpatient monitoring to ongoing high-risk care management, LatentWorks helps organizations support patients throughout the cardiac-care journey.

Cardiac Episode Symptoms begin Specialist Referral Evaluation & diagnosis Ongoing Care Support continues

Connected Cardiovascular Care

LatentWorks supports scalable programs in cardiac rehabilitation, outpatient monitoring, and continuous care management.

Solutions

Three programs. One continuum of care.

Intensive Cardiac Rehabilitation

A virtual cardiac rehabilitation program designed to expand access to structured recovery, exercise, and lifestyle support.

Learn More

Real-Time Outpatient Cardiac Telemetry

Advanced 6-lead cardiac monitoring that provides greater visibility into cardiac activity beyond the office.

Learn More

High-Risk Continuous Care Management

Structured support and care coordination for higher-risk cardiac patients between visits.

Learn More

Rehabilitation

Monitoring

LatentWorks helps connect important stages of the cardiovascular patient journey.

Explore What LatentWorks Could Bring to Your Organization

Connect with our team to discuss your cardiovascular care goals.

Intensive Cardiac Rehabilitation

Virtual Intensive Cardiac Rehabilitation

LatentWorks delivers a virtual ICR program that helps eligible cardiac patients participate in structured rehabilitation beyond the traditional facility setting.

Patient at Home Guided Exercise structured & supported Education & Lifestyle ongoing reinforcement Care Team REHABILITATION PROGRESS

Cardiac Rehabilitation Beyond the Facility

The LatentWorks virtual ICR program brings structured exercise, education, and lifestyle support into a more accessible care experience.

Core Program Components

What the Program Includes

Guided Exercise

Structured activity designed to support the patient's cardiac rehabilitation journey.

Lifestyle Education

Practical education focused on cardiovascular health and long-term behavior change.

Ongoing Support

Continued engagement throughout the patient's rehabilitation experience.

Access

Designed to Expand Access

A virtual program can help reduce barriers related to travel, location, scheduling, and traditional facility capacity.

Bring Virtual ICR to More Eligible Patients

Connect with LatentWorks to learn how virtual cardiac rehabilitation may fit within your organization.

Real-Time Outpatient Cardiac Telemetry

Greater Visibility Beyond the Office

Real-Time Outpatient Cardiac Telemetry provides advanced 6-lead ECG visibility throughout the patient's monitoring period.

LIVE ECG · 6-LEAD Normal sinus rhythm · transmitting Patient Care Team Continuous transmission throughout monitoring period
Technology

Advanced Technology for Outpatient Cardiac Monitoring

Real-Time Monitoring

Maintain visibility into cardiac activity throughout the prescribed monitoring period.

6-Lead ECG

Capture more comprehensive ECG information to support cardiac evaluation.

Full-Disclosure Data

Review recorded ECG information across the monitoring period rather than relying only on isolated events.

Clinical Value

Support More Informed Cardiac Evaluation

ROCT extends the monitoring window and helps providers evaluate intermittent cardiac activity that may not appear during a brief office visit.

Arrhythmia evaluation

Atrial fibrillation monitoring

Symptom and ECG correlation

Comparison

More Than a Snapshot

Traditional Short-Duration Monitoring

  • A limited monitoring window that may not capture intermittent events.

Explore Advanced Outpatient Cardiac Monitoring

Connect with LatentWorks to learn more about the technology and clinical value of ROCT.

High-Risk Continuous Care Management

Care That Continues Between Visits

LatentWorks helps healthcare organizations provide structured support and care coordination for higher-risk cardiac patients between clinical encounters.

Patient VISIT OUTREACH CHECK-IN VISIT Care Coordination Overview Monitoring Outreach Follow-Up Care Team

Ongoing Support for Higher-Risk Patients

Continuous care helps maintain communication, coordination, and patient engagement beyond the scheduled office visit.

Core Areas of Support

What Continuous Care Includes

Ongoing Engagement

Maintain structured contact with patients throughout their care journey.

Care Coordination

Support follow-up and communication across the patient's care plan.

Patient Education

Reinforce treatment instructions, medications, and cardiovascular health goals.

Create Greater Continuity Between Visits

Connect with LatentWorks to explore continuous care for your higher-risk cardiac population.

About LatentWorks

Building a More Connected Model of Cardiac Care

LatentWorks was created to help healthcare organizations expand important cardiovascular services beyond the limitations of traditional care settings. By bringing together healthcare operations, technology, and program support, LatentWorks helps organizations explore new ways to reach, monitor, and support cardiac patients.

Our Mission

LatentWorks helps healthcare organizations expand access to connected cardiovascular care by supporting scalable programs in cardiac rehabilitation, outpatient monitoring, and continuous care management.

Our Vision

To transform cardiovascular care from a series of isolated encounters into one continuous patient journey.

Our Approach

A connected view of cardiac care

LatentWorks views cardiac rehabilitation, outpatient monitoring, and continuous care as connected parts of a single patient journey. Our approach centers on helping organizations understand their goals, design a program that fits their priorities, activate it thoughtfully, and build a foundation for sustainable growth.

Leadership

Guided by healthcare and technology experience

Leadership Team

Healthcare Operations

Brings experience in building and scaling healthcare programs across clinical and operational settings.

Leadership Team

Technology & Product

Focused on the technology and infrastructure that support connected cardiovascular care programs.

Leadership Team

Clinical Strategy

Guides how LatentWorks partners with healthcare organizations on program strategy and design.

Let's discuss where LatentWorks may fit for your organization.

Insights

Evidence Supporting Connected Cardiac Care

Explore research and real-world findings related to virtual cardiac rehabilitation, advanced outpatient cardiac monitoring, and continuous support for higher-risk patients.

Virtual Intensive Cardiac Rehabilitation

Expanding Access to Cardiac Rehabilitation

Virtual and home-based cardiac rehabilitation can extend structured exercise, education, and lifestyle support beyond the traditional facility setting.

19%–34%
Cardiac Rehabilitation Participation

National analyses have found that only approximately 19% to 34% of eligible patients participate in cardiac rehabilitation.

National utilization analysis Million Hearts & CDC

Participation rates vary by location, diagnosis, patient population, referral practices, and access to cardiac rehabilitation programs.

View Source
87%
Reported Virtual Program Completion

Recora reports that 87% of patients complete its virtual cardiac recovery program, compared with a cited national cardiac rehabilitation completion rate of 26%.

Vendor-reported program outcome Recora

This result was reported by Recora and should not be interpreted as an independently validated or guaranteed outcome for every virtual cardiac rehabilitation program.

View Source
36% Lower Mortality Hazard
Home-Based Rehabilitation and Long-Term Survival

In one Veterans Health Administration cohort, participation in home-based cardiac rehabilitation was associated with a 36% lower adjusted hazard of mortality.

Observational cohort study JAHA, 2023

This was an observational association and does not prove that home-based cardiac rehabilitation caused the reduction in mortality.

View Source
51.2% vs. 17.7%
Improvement in Walking Capacity

In one home-based telerehabilitation study involving older heart-failure patients, improvement in six-minute walking distance was 51.2% in the intervention group compared with 17.7% in the control group.

Prospective clinical study Home-Based Telerehabilitation Study

This finding came from one study of 81 patients and should not be generalized to every patient population or virtual cardiac rehabilitation program.

View Source
Home-Based Cardiac Rehabilitation and Mortality Observational cohort
  • Journal of the American Heart Association, 2023
  • Home-based cardiac rehabilitation was associated with a 36% lower hazard of mortality over a median follow-up of 4.2 years.
View Source
Home-Based Cardiac Telerehabilitation Effectiveness Systematic review
  • Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials in heart-failure patients.
  • Home-based telerehabilitation improved functional capacity and physical activity compared with usual care.
  • Several outcomes were reported as comparable with center-based rehabilitation.
View Source
Recora Virtual Cardiac Recovery Outcomes Vendor-reported
  • Recora reports an 87% program completion rate for its virtual cardiac recovery program.
  • This is a vendor-reported program experience and should be distinguished from independently peer-reviewed evidence.
View Source
Virtual cardiac rehabilitation outcomes vary based on patient selection, clinical condition, program design, adherence, technology, supervision, and participating organization. Vendor-reported results should be distinguished from independently peer-reviewed evidence.
Real-Time Outpatient Cardiac Telemetry

Greater Clinical Visibility Through 6-Lead Monitoring

Many ambulatory monitors provide limited ECG perspectives. ROCT captures six ECG leads, giving providers a broader view of cardiac electrical activity throughout the monitoring period.

6 Leads
A Broader View of Cardiac Activity

Six-lead monitoring provides multiple electrical perspectives of the heart, offering more waveform information than a standard one- or two-lead ambulatory ECG.

Technology & interpretation benefit

More leads provide additional ECG information but do not guarantee that every arrhythmia or cardiac abnormality will be detected.

41% vs. 15%
Higher Diagnostic Yield With Mobile Telemetry

In one multicenter randomized trial, mobile cardiac outpatient telemetry produced a diagnosis in 41% of patients compared with 15% using a standard external loop event monitor.

Randomized multicenter trial J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol, 2007

This study evaluated mobile telemetry as a monitoring category and was not a direct comparison of a six-lead device with a two-lead device.

View Source
27% vs. 6%
Clinically Significant Arrhythmia Detection

In the same trial, clinically significant arrhythmias were detected in 27% of patients using mobile telemetry compared with 6% using a standard loop event monitor.

Randomized multicenter trial J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol, 2007

Detection rates vary according to patient population, symptoms, monitoring duration, technology, and clinical indication.

View Source
61% vs. 24%
Mobile Telemetry Compared With Holter Monitoring

A large retrospective claims analysis reported a diagnostic yield of 61% for mobile cardiac telemetry compared with 24% for Holter monitoring and 23% for event monitoring.

Retrospective claims analysis PMC, 2013

This was not a randomized trial or a direct six-lead-versus-two-lead comparison. Differences in patient selection and monitoring duration may have influenced the findings.

View Source

More Leads. More Clinical Context.

Six-lead ROCT gives providers a broader view of cardiac electrical activity than traditional limited-lead ambulatory monitoring, while real-time transmission and extended observation help capture intermittent events beyond the office.

Six-Lead Comparison

Why Six Leads Matter

Standard One- or Two-Lead Ambulatory ECG

  • Fewer electrical perspectives
  • Primarily focused on cardiac rhythm
  • More limited waveform context
  • May provide less information for evaluating P-wave morphology, conduction patterns, and ST-segment changes

Diagnostic yield depends on more than lead count alone. Monitoring duration, real-time transmission, signal quality, full-disclosure data, patient risk, and the frequency of intermittent events also influence what may be detected.

LatentWorks does not claim that six-lead ROCT has a specific percentage increase in diagnostic yield over a two-lead monitor absent a direct, device-specific, head-to-head clinical study. Diagnostic-yield statistics from general mobile telemetry studies are not combined with six-lead technology claims in a way that implies those studies specifically tested the LatentWorks or DMS six-lead system.

Monitoring the Patient's Current Clinical Picture

A cardiac monitoring study reflects the patient's rhythm during a defined observation period. When symptoms recur, treatment changes, a procedure occurs, or the patient's clinical condition evolves, another monitoring period may provide updated information.

  • New or recurrent palpitations
  • Syncope or presyncope
  • Recurring dizziness or unexplained symptoms
  • Medication or antiarrhythmic therapy changes
  • Evaluation of treatment effectiveness
  • Post-procedure rhythm assessment
  • Suspected recurrent atrial fibrillation
  • Persistent symptoms following an initially nondiagnostic study
  • A meaningful change in cardiac status
Repeat ambulatory monitoring must be based on physician judgment, patient-specific circumstances, medical necessity, current symptoms, applicable clinical guidance, and payer requirements. Every patient should not automatically receive multiple monitoring studies each year.
Mobile Cardiac Outpatient Telemetry vs. Loop Event Monitoring Randomized trial
  • 305 patients enrolled across a multicenter randomized trial.
  • 41% versus 15% diagnostic yield favoring mobile telemetry.
  • 27% versus 6% clinically significant arrhythmia detection.
View Source
Fourteen-Day ECG Monitoring vs. 24-Hour Holter Comparative study
  • 66% versus 9% paroxysmal arrhythmia detection favoring the 14-day patch.
  • Results relate specifically to the patch technology studied and should not be generalized to every device.
View Source
Long-Term Atrial Fibrillation Monitoring Observational cohort
  • 396-patient observational cohort with suspected cryptogenic stroke or TIA.
  • 2.5% short-term detection versus a 14.6% diagnostic yield with longer-term monitoring.
View Source
Mobile Cardiac Telemetry vs. Holter and Event Monitoring Retrospective claims analysis
  • Retrospective analysis of claims data spanning 57 months and more than 200,000 patients.
  • 61% diagnostic yield for mobile cardiac telemetry compared with 24% for Holter monitoring and 23% for event monitoring.
  • Not a randomized trial or a direct six-lead-versus-two-lead device comparison.
View Source
Monitoring results vary according to clinical indication, symptom frequency, patient population, lead configuration, monitoring duration, device, interpretation process, and study design. Published research involving another monitoring technology should not be represented as direct evidence for the LatentWorks system unless the studied technology is the same.
High-Risk Continuous Care Management

Supporting Higher-Risk Patients Between Visits

Structured chronic care management can strengthen communication, medication support, care coordination, and follow-up for patients living with multiple chronic conditions.

23 Fewer ED Visits
Reduced Growth in Emergency Utilization

A CMS evaluation estimated 23 fewer emergency department visits per 1,000 Chronic Care Management beneficiaries compared with matched comparison beneficiaries.

Matched observational evaluation Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services

The finding represents an association from an observational evaluation and is not a guaranteed program outcome.

View Source
47 Fewer Hospitalizations
Reduced Growth in Inpatient Utilization

The CMS evaluation estimated 47 fewer hospitalizations per 1,000 CCM beneficiaries compared with matched comparison beneficiaries.

Matched observational evaluation Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services

This finding reflects a matched observational analysis and should not be presented as a guaranteed reduction in hospitalizations.

View Source
$74 Lower Monthly Spending Growth
Lower Medicare Expenditure Growth

At 18 months, CMS estimated that total Medicare spending growth was $74 lower per beneficiary per month among CCM participants, excluding CCM service fees.

Matched observational evaluation Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services

This reflects lower expenditure growth in a matched evaluation and should not be presented as guaranteed savings for a practice, patient, or payer.

View Source
684,000+
Medicare Beneficiaries Served

More than 684,000 Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries received Chronic Care Management services during the program's first two years.

Government program evaluation Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services

This statistic reflects national Medicare CCM utilization during the period studied and does not represent LatentWorks enrollment.

View Source
CMS Chronic Care Management Evaluation Government evaluation
  • Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, matched observational evaluation.
  • 23 fewer emergency department visits per 1,000 beneficiaries.
  • 47 fewer hospitalizations per 1,000 beneficiaries.
  • $74 lower monthly expenditure growth at 18 months.
View Source
CMS Chronic Care Management Overview Program overview
  • CMS describes CCM as care management for patients with two or more chronic conditions.
  • Qualifying conditions are expected to last at least 12 months or until death and create significant clinical risk.
View Source
The CMS findings came from matched observational analyses and should be presented as associations rather than proof that CCM directly caused the reported utilization or spending differences. Individual outcomes vary by patient population, program design, care delivery, engagement, and clinical complexity.
Understanding the Evidence

How to Read These Findings

Randomized Trial

Participants are assigned to different interventions, providing stronger evidence for comparing clinical approaches.

Systematic Review

Researchers evaluate findings across multiple studies to understand the overall body of evidence.

Observational Study

Researchers examine real-world outcomes without assigning treatments. Findings show associations but may be influenced by differences between groups.

Vendor-Reported Outcome

A company reports results from its own program experience. These results should be distinguished from independent peer-reviewed research.

Explore the Evidence Behind Connected Cardiac Care

Connect with LatentWorks to discuss how virtual cardiac rehabilitation, outpatient cardiac monitoring, and continuous care may support your organization.

Contact

Start a Conversation

Tell us about your organization and the cardiac-care opportunities you are exploring.

Let's talk

A member of the LatentWorks team will follow up to schedule a consultation and learn more about your organization's goals.

Inquiries
hello@latentworks.com
Response Time
Within one business day

Thank you for reaching out

A member of the LatentWorks team will follow up shortly to schedule your consultation.

Legal

Privacy Policy

Legal

Terms of Use